|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 25-29
Nonaneurysmal cerebrovascular conditions associated with intracranial arterial fenestrations
Salima B Alsaadi1, Samer S Hoz2, Saad Abdul Kareem Mohammed Al-Obaidi3, Bahaa S Abdalnaby1, Ammar M Al-Smaysim2
1 Department of Neuroradiology, Neurosurgery Teaching Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq
2 Department of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery Teaching Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq
3 Department of Emergency, Al-Alwaiya Children Teaching Hospital, Al-Rasafa, Baghdad, Iraq
|Date of Submission||15-Mar-2020|
|Date of Acceptance||24-Mar-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||20-Aug-2020|
Dr. Saad Abdul Kareem Mohammed Al-Obaidi
Department of Emergency, Al-Ilwiyah Paediatric Hospital, Al-Rasafa, Baghdad
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Cerebral arteries have been identified with multiple anatomical variations, including a concomitant fenestration with aneurysms, but no association is proven. Aim: to investigate non aneurysmal disorders associated with intracranial arterial fenestration. Methods: A thorough and detailed analysis of the available literature from 1970 to 2020 in PubMed were contemplated to identify and address all the disorders associated with arterial fenestration with exclusion of intracranial aneurysms. Results: While segmental vulnerability may induce invisible anatomical histological and hemodynamic changes, cadaveric studies showed that the frequency of fenestration is up to 40% higher than the clinical reports, and the cadaveric reports also showed a higher occurrence of such fenestrations as compared to radiological studies. The vertebrobasilar system, the most common site of fenestration. Fused vertebrae and other vascular defects of up to 7% are previously associated with the vertebral artery fenestration. Conclusion: intracranial fenestration is a critical anatomical variant. Thus, A comprehensive angiographical examination can enhance overall prognosis in presurgical planning in association with other vascular abnormalities.
Keywords: Anatomy, arterial fenestration, nonaneurysmal, vascular
|How to cite this article:|
Alsaadi SB, Hoz SS, Al-Obaidi SA, Abdalnaby BS, Al-Smaysim AM. Nonaneurysmal cerebrovascular conditions associated with intracranial arterial fenestrations. Mustansiriya Med J 2020;19:25-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Alsaadi SB, Hoz SS, Al-Obaidi SA, Abdalnaby BS, Al-Smaysim AM. Nonaneurysmal cerebrovascular conditions associated with intracranial arterial fenestrations. Mustansiriya Med J [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 24];19:25-9. Available from: https://www.mmjonweb.org/text.asp?2020/19/1/25/292715
| Introduction|| |
Anatomical variants of the cerebral arteries are encountered in a regular basis as an incidental finding. Fenestration means a vascular variation that begins with a common origin and then splits into two parallel luminal channels and re-joins distally. Each channel has its endothelium and tunica media but may share the adventitia as well. These two channels reunite distinctly. The etiology is thought to be due to the failure of midline fusion during embryogenesis, but this is controversial, depending on the site of fenestration. It differs from duplication that the latter variation also has a duplicated origin [Table 1].
The association of fenestrations with aneurysms has been extensively reported in the case of the series, although the exact relationship is not well-defined in studies with large samples.,,, Probable association of fenestration with an aneurysm due to the presence of focal defects on the media layer at the proximal and distal end of the fenestrated segments is challenging for neurosurgeons and also interventional neuroradiologist.
Aim of the study
Focus the light on a rare entity of congenital vascular anomaly and its association with other anomalies or with cerebrovascular pathologies. The association between intracranial arterial fenestration (ICF) and the saccular aneurysm is frequently the focus of reports; we conduct a review of nonaneurysm conditions or anomalies that are reported to be associated with arterial fenestration demonstrating its clinical significance.
| Methods|| |
A PubMed search of the English literature was conducted for 1970–2017 publications describing the cases of ICF and any associated condition or other vascular anomalies associated with it. The analysis excluded all the articles and case reports describing ICF and associated with intracranial aneurysm. We also excluded the reports of fenestrations without associated anomalies or pathologies. Data were collected from published cases on patient presentation, fenestration anatomic location, associated pathologies, and other vascular anomalies if present.
| Results and Discussion|| |
We have conducted a comparative review, seeking the reported cases so far regarding the association of ICF with nonaneurysmal anomalies or pathology,,,,,,,,, [Table 2].
|Table 2: Characteristics of fenestrated intracranial arteries were associated with nonaneurysmal vascular pathology or anomalies reported in the literature between 1970 and 2017|
Click here to view
The presence of vascular anomalies may imply an existing “segmental vulnerability,” which was explained by Lasjaunias. The segmental vulnerability is due to regional specificity in vascular anatomy and regional differences in responses to biological stimuli that affect the vascular environment. Such specificity generates an invisible discontinuity in the homogenous anatomical and histological hemodynamic system.
ICFs are a rare anatomic variant and remain indeterminate and likely heterogeneous clinical significance. They more often manifest in the anterior communication arterial complex and basilar artery (BA). Up to now, the frequency of fenestrations has been studied with cadavers,, and conventional angiographic series., The rate of fenestrations based on published conventional angiographic series has been much lower than that at cadaveric series.
Embryologically, the artery is plexiform until approximately the 18-mm stage, when it gradually becomes a single channel at the 21–24-mm stage e.g., anterior communicating artery (AcomA). Incomplete fusion of this plexus may result in either segmental or complete doubling of this artery. Fenestration of the BA is thought to be a result of incomplete fusion of the two primitive longitudinal arteries in the embryo at about the 5–9-mm stage. The vertebral artery (VA) forms from an anastomosis between the cervical intersegmental arteries during the 7–12-mm stage, at which point there is a transient basilar-VA anastomosis. A remnant of this channel may explain such duplication. An anterior cerebral artery (ACA) fenestration may form because of the persistence of plexiform anastomosis between the primitive olfactory artery and the ACA. Whether this type of association represents concurrent congenital anomalies of embryological fusion or is purely coincidental remains a point of debate. Segmentally, unfused arteries constitute a lack of fusion of embryologically paired vessels. Duplications can occur where the “double-lumen” is due to two embryologically different vessels that fuse during development and an additional vessel persists. This is distinct from the fenestration where the two lumina correspond to a single artery.
The most common site of fenestration is the vertebrobasilar (VB) system, with the high prevalence reported in previous studies. Bharatha et al. reported a 2.8% overall rate of ICF. The issue of association of fenestrations with aneurysms has been found interesting by neuroradiologists and neurosurgeons for many years. Earlier studies have reported a high incidence of aneurysms in association with arterial fenestrations. Pathologically, it could be explained by the defects in the vessel wall at each end of the fenestration, which results in hemodynamic stress and structural degenerative changes in the vessel. It could be assumed that although fenestration is recognized as a risk for aneurysmal development, a significant association cannot be established [Table 3].
A fenestration is defined as a single artery with two luminal channels and may be due to a nerve or other anatomical structures “piercing” the artery. Theoretically, VA fenestration may mimic dissection. In both cases, there are two canals; however, in dissection, an intimal flap was usually too small for visualization as the second canal; this is confirmed by Teasdale et al. The actual prevalence of this anomaly is probably higher. The low reporting incidence is due to a lack of clinical implications themselves, examining only the upper part of the neck during routine cerebral angiography or the presence of tiny fenestrations called arterial splits, assumed to be intraluminal defects., Although very small fenestrations are called “arterial splits,” fenestrations-occupying long parts of the vessel and form two apparent independent arteries known as a big fenestration or “segmental duplications.” Even more picturesque names can be found in the literature such as a “buttonhole” or “island” formation, and the terms “bypass anomaly” and “diastematoarteria” have also been used. Recently, Vasović has proposed that the V1 segment fenestration is called a segmental duplication, and the V4 segment fenestration the “arteria vertebralis unfenestrated.” The names “pseudofenestration” or “extreme fenestration” of the VA are also used.,,,
The complete occurrence of this well-known anatomy is not frequent, and it is important to know anatomical variations while interpreting imaging studies and before interventions. Few studies investigated the association between ICF and the vascular pathologies or anomalies other than an aneurysm and its possible significance. The VA fenestration is often associated with other anomalies of the brain, spinal cord, and spine; these include fused vertebrae, other vascular anomalies, and an increased prevalence of aneurysms and vascular malformations. Uchino et al. have reported the frequency of coexistence of arteriovenous malformation and VA fenestration was 7%. Uchino et al. remark that atherosclerosis might hinder fenestration in the elderly. There has also been speculation about associations between VB system fenestrations and brainstem ischemia, or infarctions, although their relationships are still controversial. Tanaka et al. in a neuroradiological analysis of 23 BA fenestrations cases noted three cases of atherothrombotic infarctions (13%) in the territory of the VB system. The hemodynamic stress resulting from the fenestration of the feeding system of AVM might be an important factor in the enlargement of the small cerebellar AVM. An AVM associated with fenestration of the cranial arteries may more likely to bleed than AVM without this anomaly. The pathological (hyalinized) vessels in the small AVM probably succumbed to pressure within the vessels induced by the hemodynamic stress resulting from fenestration of the VA, with consequent enlargement to a typical AVM. In an angiographic study of 51 patients, Uchino et al. reported a 7% prevalence of VA fenestration in cases of known arteriovenous malformations. Moreover, reports of VA fenestration have been associated with epidermoid cysts, other fenestrations, persistent trigeminal artery, neuralgia, VB ischemia, and agenesis of the corpus callosum.
The angiographic incidence of all fenestrations has been reported to be 0.3%–0.9%, whereas autopsy studies show the incidence of AcomA fenestrations to be 7.5%–40%, BA fenestrations 1%–5%, and VA fenestrations to be 1%–2%., Because of their low fenestration rates compared to cadaver series, and lack of data from nonaneurysmatic patients, de Gast et al. could not establish a definite relationship. The higher sensitivity of postmortem analysis and the under-reporting of fenestrations on angiography can explain such discrepancies, as fenestrations are often asymptomatic unless accompanied by the asymptomatic aneurysm. On the other hand, the prospective identification of fenestrations, since they may result in complex anatomy, can be critical for planning surgical or endovascular procedures with safety.
| Conclusion|| |
Variations in the arterial system, whether normal or anomalies, are not uncommon angiographic findings, and these findings may be a warning sign for other associated more complex pathologies. A thorough and sophisticated preprocedural or presurgical study of the patient's angiography may increase the possibility of discovering nonaneurysmal-associated anomalies and then include these findings as intimate parts of management planning to improve the overall prognosis and minimize the possibility of unfavorable surprises. For sure, the firmer conclusion can certainly be drawn with continuing reports of such associations and their clinical significance.
- Variations in the arterial system are common findings
- Vascular anomalies may traduce into a segmental vulnerability
- Vertebral artery fenestration may mimic dissection
- Vascular variations potentially endanger the patient during the procedure
- Preprocedural angiography may be of benefit to avoid harm for patients.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Hakim A, Gralla J, Rozeik C, Mordasini P, Leidolt L, Piechowiak E, et al
. Anomalies and normal variants of the cerebral arterial supply: A comprehensive pictorial review with a proposed workflow for classification and significance. J Neuroimaging 2018;28:14-35.
Bayrak AH, Senturk S, Akay HO, Ozmen CA, Bukte Y, Nazaroglu H. The frequency of intracranial arterial fenestrations: A study with 64-detector CT-angiography. Eur J Radiol 2011;77:392-6.
Graves VB, Strother CM, Weir B, Duff TA. Vertebrobasilar junction aneurysms associated with fenestration: Treatment with guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:35-40.
Cademartiri F, Stojanov D, Dippel DW, Lugt AV, Tanghe H. Noninvasive detection of a ruptured aneurysm at a basilar artery fenestration with submillimeter multisection CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:2009-10.
de Oliveira JG, Rochemont RD, Beck J, Hermann E, Gerlach R, Raabe A, et al
. A rare anomaly of the anterior communicating artery complex hidden by a large broad-neck aneurysm and disclosed by three-dimensional rotational angiography. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2008;150:279-84.
Islak C, Kocer N, Kantarci F, Saatci I, Uzma O, Canbaz B. Endovascular management of basilar artery aneurysms associated with fenestrations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:958-64.
Finlay HM, Canham PB. The layered fabric of cerebral artery fenestrations. Stroke 1994;25:1799-806.
Mizukami M, Mine T, Tomita T. Fenestration of the vertebral artery (vertebral diastematoarteria). Coexistence of cerebral aneurysm and cerebral arteriovenous malformation. No To Shinkei 1968;20:1271-6.
Yoshimoto H, Maeda H, Aoyama H, Kanazawa J, Kitaoka T, Uozumi T. Enlargement of cerebellar arteriovenous malformation associated with fenestration of the vertebral artery – Case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1992;32:585-8.
Yong JA, Seong OK. Arteriovenous malformation at cerebellopontine angle associated with a fenestration of the vertebral artery. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg 2000;2:200-4.
Uchino A, Kato A, Abe M, Kudo S. Association of cerebral arteriovenous malformation with cerebral arterial fenestration. Eur Radiol 2001;11:493-6.
Okahara M, Kiyosue H, Mori H, Tanoue S, Sainou M, Nagatomi H. Anatomic variations of the cerebral arteries and their embryology: A pictorial review. Eur Radiol 2002;12:2548-61.
Chen YY, Chang FC, Hu HH, Chao AC. Fenestration of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery associated with aneurysm and ischemic stroke. Surg Neurol 2007;68 Suppl 1:S60-3.
Bharatha A, Aviv RI, White J, Fox AJ, Symons SP. Intracranial arterial fenestrations: Frequency on CT angiography and association with other vascular lesions. Surg Radiol Anat 2008;30:397-401.
Kalmykov M. Cerebral artery fenestrations: incidence, association with cerebral arterial aneurysms and other vascular diseases according to the data of multislice spiral computed tomography angiography. Vestnik rentgenologii i radiologii. 2014(2):21-5.
Krings T, Baccin CE, Alvarez H, Ozanne A, Stracke P, Lasjaunias PL. Segmental unfused basilar artery with kissing aneurysms: Report of three cases and literature review. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2007;149:567-74.
Lasjaunias PL. Segmental identity and vulnerability in cerebral arteries. Interv Neuroradiol 2000;6:113-24.
Cooke DL, Stout CE, Kim WT, Kansagra AP, Yu JP, Gu A, et al
. Cerebral arterial fenestrations. Interv Neuroradiol 2014;20:261-74.
Wollschlaeger G, Wollschlaeger PB, Lucas FV, Lopez VF. Experience and result with postmortem cerebral angiography performed as routine procedure of the autopsy. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1967;101:68-87.
Serizawa T, Saeki N, Yamaura A. Microsurgical anatomy and clinical significance of the anterior communicating artery and its perforating branches. Neurosurg 1997;40:1211-6.
Gomes FB, Dujovny M, Umansky F, Berman SK, Diaz FG, Ausman JI, et al
. Microanatomy of the anterior cerebral artery. Surg Neurol 1986;26:129-41.
Sanders WP, Sorek PA, Mehta BA. Fenestration of intracranial arteries with special attention to associated aneurysms and other anomalies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1993;14:675-80.
Kowada M, Yamaguchi K, Takahashi H. Fenestration of the vertebral artery with a review of 23 cases in Japan. Radiology 1972;103:343-6.
Banach MJ, Flamm ES. Supraclinoid internal carotid artery fenestration with an associated aneurysm. Case report. J Neurosurg 1993;79:438-41.
Kovač JD, Stanković A, Stanković D, Kovač B, Šaranović D. Intracranial arterial variations: A comprehensive evaluation using CT angiography. Med Sci Monit 2014;20:420-7.
Teasdale E, Zampakis P, Santosh C, Razvi S. Multidetector computed tomography angiography: Application in vertebral artery dissection. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2011;14:35-41.
] [Full text]
Tseng YC, Hsu HL, Lee TH, Wang LJ, Wong YC, Chen CJ. Fenestration of the vertebral artery at the lower cervical segment – Imaging findings and literature review. Eur J Radiol Extra 2004;49:37-40.
Vasović LP. Reevaluation of the morphological parameters according to 11 different duplications of the fetal vertebral artery at prevertebral (V1) and intracranial (V4) parts. Cells Tissues Organs 2004;176:195-204.
Thomas AJ, Germanwala AV, Vora N, Prevedello DM, Jovin T, Kassam A, et al
. Dual origin extracranial vertebral artery: Case report and embryology. J Neuroimaging 2008;18:173-6.
Giuffrè R, Sherkat S. Maldevelopmental pathology of the vertebral artery in infancy and childhood. Childs Nerv Syst 2000;16:627-32.
Uchino A, Sawada A, Takase Y, Kudo S. Extreme fenestration of the right vertebral artery: Magnetic resonance angiographic demonstration. Eur Radiol 2002;12 Suppl 3:S32-4.
Pekcevik Y, Pekcevik R. Variations of the cerebellar arteries at CT angiography. Surg Radiol Anat 2014;36:455-61.
Tran-Dinh HD, Soo YS, Jayasinghe LS. Duplication of the vertebro-basilar system. Australas Radiol 1991;35:220-4.
Uchino A, Nomiyama K, Takase Y, Kudo S. Anterior cerebral artery variations detected by MR angiography. Neuroradiol 2006;48:647-52.
Dodevski A, Lazareska M, Tosovska-Lazarova D, Zhivadinovik J, Stojkoski A. Basilar artery fenestration. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2011;70:80-3.
Tanaka M, Kikuchi Y, Ouchi T. Neuroradiological analysis of 23 cases of basilar artery fenestration based on 2280 cases of MR angiographies. Interv Neuroradiol 2006;12:39-44.
de Gast AN, van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M. Fenestrations of the anterior communicating artery: Incidence on 3D angiography and relationship to aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:296-8.
Hacein-Bey L, Muszynski CA, Varelas PN. Saccular aneurysm associated with posterior cerebral artery fenestration manifesting as a subarachnoid hemorrhage in a child. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1291-4.
Aybar LA, Martin AV, Ruiperez CP, Boto GR, Garcia JA. Prevalence of fenestrated basilar artery with magnetic resonance angiography: A transversal study. Surg Radiol Anat 2013;35:487-93.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]